Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) criticized his party again – this time over the ongoing government shutdown, accusing Democratic leaders of putting partisan interests ahead of the American people.

Fetterman, who has sided with Republicans on a series of votes on a clean bill to reopen the government, referred to the standoff as the “Schumer Shutdown,” alleging that Democrats are effectively holding the government hostage rather than working toward a bipartisan funding solution.

Fetterman made several comments during NewsNation’s live town hall at the Kennedy Center on Wednesday that demonstrate why he is considered a maverick among Democrats in the Senate. “I follow country, then party,” he explained.

Gee…what a concept.

“You don’t hold the government hostage,” Fetterman added, noting that the Schumer shutdown is “what the Democratic Party wants to do.”

Fetterman highlighted that he is one of only two Democrats who crossed the aisle to vote for the clean continuing resolution, ensuring the government remains open. “It’s the wrong thing for the country, and in a period of chaos, I refuse to shut our government down,” he said.

The Pennsylvania senator also took aim at the radical wing of his own party, calling out the reckless rhetoric that’s become all too common on the left. He explained why he refuses to label his political opponents as “fascists” or “Nazis” — language he says has fueled a dangerous rise in left-wing violence across the country.

“I know and I love people who voted for President Trump. But they are not fascists, they’re not Nazis, they’re not trying to destroy the Constitution and those things,” he insisted. “I refuse to call people Nazis or fascists. I would never compare anybody — anybody to Hitler.”

Isn’t it telling that basic common sense now makes John Fetterman look like the last sane Democrat standing?

Fetterman warned that the left’s obsession with branding everyone they disagree with inflammatory language is only pouring gasoline on the fire of political violence in this country.

He even referenced the assassination of Charlie Kirk, condemning those within his own party who exploited the conservative leader’s death for political gain — something he called shameful and deeply wrong.

“Let people grieve — give people the space. I’m not going to use that terrible thing and that tragic assassination to make my argument and try to put out my views,” he told a hushed crowd.

Fetterman pointed out that the country almost plunged into chaos when President Trump narrowly avoided being shot in Butler.

“It’s like, my God, he’s a father that had his neck blown out by a bullet. And now people have forgotten President Trump was — in my state — was shot in the head. Could you imagine where our nation would be if he were hit in the same way with Kirk?” he asked.

“We’ve really got to turn the temperature down,” he added.

You know what happens when you show a little sanity in today’s Democrat Party? When you dare to call for less violence or suggest that the so-called “resistance” cares more about scoring political points than helping real Americans?

You get targeted. You get punished. And that’s exactly what’s happening to John Fetterman right now — his own party is trying to shove him out for daring to speak the truth.

An Axios report this morning indicates that top Democrats in Pennsylvania are “maneuvering to run against Sen. John Fetterman in a 2028 primary contest,” a move that is “threatening to tear the party apart in the biggest battleground state in the nation.”

They can’t stomach the fact that Fetterman sees through their tricks. They’re now openly plotting to toss him aside — even at the cost of losing a Senate seat.

Steve Irwin’s Daughter Shares ‘Devastating’ Health Update

Bindi Irwin and Chandler Powell recently opened up about their family and the deep gratitude they feel for their daughter, Grace, who is now three years old. The couple described Grace as a “miracle” baby, especially after Bindi’s struggles with endometriosis, a condition that affects fertility. Bindi’s journey to motherhood was filled with challenges, and Grace’s arrival was a testament to the couple’s resilience and hope. Their story has touched many, and the Irwins have emphasized the significance of their little girl in their lives.

While Bindi and Chandler are deeply fulfilled by their family of three, they remain open to the idea of having more children in the future. However, they also expressed how blessed they feel with Grace and are in no rush to expand their family at the moment. Their perspective on parenting has been shaped by their own experiences and the joy Grace brings them every day. For now, they are focused on cherishing their time together as a family and navigating life with their young daughter.

Bindi took the opportunity to remind fans about the importance of being sensitive when asking about family planning. She acknowledged that many people face their own personal challenges when it comes to starting or expanding their families, and that such conversations can be difficult for some. This was a heartfelt request to those following her family’s journey to be mindful of the emotional complexities that come with discussions surrounding future children. Bindi’s candidness about the sensitive nature of the subject highlighted the importance of understanding and empathy.

In addition, Bindi urged fans to respect their privacy when it comes to decisions about future children. She shared that discussions about family growth are deeply personal, and that they hope to keep such matters private for the time being. The couple expressed a desire to shield themselves from external pressure, giving them the space to navigate their family’s path on their own terms. As they focus on raising Grace, Bindi and Chandler’s message was clear: family planning is a deeply emotional and private matter, and they wish to protect that space.

28.DHS Fact Checks Ilhan Omar’s False ‘Abolish ICE’ Post After Bogus Report Resurfaces

U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) recently found herself at the center of a controversy after she shared a misleading post calling for the abolition of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The congresswoman, a frequent critic of the agency, cited a report that was later retracted by NBC News. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was quick to fact-check Omar’s claims and clear up the confusion, revealing that the original reporting was inaccurate and, in fact, mischaracterized the actions of ICE agents.

The incident began when Omar referenced a story titled, “Video shows ICE with 5-year-old girl while agents attempt to arrest her father.” The story had been originally published by NBC News, but it was later removed after the outlet quietly issued a retraction.

Omar posted her opinion on X (formerly Twitter), writing: “This is vile and beyond cruel. Abolish ICE.” She appeared to be referring to a video in which ICE agents were allegedly shown interacting with a young girl while attempting to arrest her father.

However, what Omar and many others failed to realize was that the story was based on a now-deleted NBC News report that was inaccurate. The story painted a sympathetic picture of the father and suggested that ICE agents had used the young girl as “bait” in an attempt to arrest her father.

The video footage was reportedly obtained by Telemundo Nueva Inglaterra and depicted an emotionally charged moment. The child’s mother claimed that her daughter, who is autistic, had been left alone with ICE agents while her father attempted to flee the scene of his arrest.

According to NBC News, the child’s mother told them that her husband, the father of the child, had called her to say that he was being followed by authorities.

She claimed that he managed to run back to the parking lot of their residence, leaving his 5-year-old daughter in the car with the agents. In the video, the mother is heard telling ICE agents, “They took my daughter, she’s 5 years old. She has autism spectrum. Give me my daughter back.”

This scene quickly became a focal point for criticism, with Omar seizing on the moment to call for ICE to be abolished. She described the actions of ICE as “vile and beyond cruel,” characterizing them as part of a larger pattern of abuse.

However, as more details emerged, it became clear that the initial reporting from NBC News was severely flawed, and DHS immediately stepped in to correct the record.

DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Tricia McLaughlin, took to X to set the record straight. She called out the inaccurate reporting and criticized Omar’s reaction. McLaughlin wrote, “This is a vile lie. [Ilhan Omar’s] habitual lies and demonization of our law enforcement is what’s cruel.”

She continued, “ICE agents NEVER used a 5-year-old girl as ‘bait.’ The criminal illegal alien target — with previous arrests for domestic abuse and strangulation, among other charges — ABANDONED his own child in a car.”

McLaughlin went on to provide further context, revealing that the father, identified as Edwards Hip Mejia, had a history of criminal activity. According to DHS, Mejia ignored law enforcement emergency lights, drove back to his house, and fled from the car, giving officers the “double middle finger” before running inside his home.

He abandoned his 5-year-old daughter in the vehicle. McLaughlin emphasized that ICE agents were not responsible for placing the child in danger. Rather, they acted to rescue the child and immediately notified local police about the abandonment.

The girl’s father, a Guatemalan national, had been living in the U.S. for about 25 years. After abandoning his child, Mejia was eventually detained by ICE two days later.

He is currently being held at an ICE detention center in Plymouth, Massachusetts, as he awaits further legal proceedings. His wife, who asked to remain anonymous, confirmed the details of the situation in an interview with NBC Boston.

NBC News, after facing backlash for its original coverage, issued a retraction at the bottom of its article. The correction read: “An earlier version of this article mischaracterized the activities of ICE agents in the video.The article has been updated.” This retraction, however, did little to quell the controversy. By then, Omar’s post had already gone viral, with many of her followers sharing her outrage over the situation without knowing the full context.

The department’s intervention highlights the ongoing battle over immigration policy in the U.S., particularly the heated debate surrounding ICE’s role in enforcing immigration laws.

Omar, a vocal critic of ICE, has long advocated for the agency’s abolition, arguing that it is responsible for numerous human rights violations. However, this incident raises questions about the reliability of information that she, along with other critics of ICE, uses to make her case.

The fallout from this incident has exposed a larger issue regarding the spread of misinformation and the consequences of amplifying unverified claims.

In an age of social media, where posts can go viral in a matter of minutes, it is increasingly important to ensure that the facts are thoroughly vetted before making public statements that can influence public opinion.

Omar’s swift move to call for the abolition of ICE based on an inaccurate and retracted report demonstrates the power of unchecked political rhetoric in shaping public discourse.

Her condemnation of ICE was swift and unequivocal, but the facts didn’t support her claims. The video that she referenced had been taken down, and the story itself had been corrected, but by then, the narrative had already taken root among her supporters.

While critics of ICE have legitimate concerns about the agency’s practices, the use of misleading or incomplete information to advance an agenda only undermines those concerns.

If Omar and others on the far-left truly want to have an honest conversation about immigration reform, they must first prioritize accuracy over sensationalism.

Only by doing so can we hope to move forward with meaningful dialogue and solutions that address the very real issues facing immigrants and their families.

This episode also highlights the broader challenges that come with the growing distrust in the media. The fact that NBC News had to retract its story serves as a reminder of the importance of responsible journalism in shaping public opinion.

The initial error by NBC News, coupled with Omar’s hastily made post, underscores how misinformation can quickly spiral out of control and become entrenched in the political discourse.

It’s clear that the debate over ICE and immigration policy is far from over, but as we move forward, it is crucial that all parties involved rely on facts and evidence to make their arguments.

Political leaders, journalists, and social media influencers alike have a responsibility to ensure that their statements are grounded in truth, especially when dealing with issues that have such far-reaching consequences for individuals and communities.

In the case of Ilhan Omar’s call to abolish ICE, it’s evident that her post was based on misinformation. The fact-checking by DHS was necessary to clear up the confusion, but the damage had already been done.

For those who follow her rhetoric, the narrative that ICE is cruel and inhumane had already been cemented. In order to foster meaningful progress on immigration reform, it’s essential that we confront these issues with a commitment to truth and integrity, not with politically charged rhetoric that only serves to divide us further.

In the end, the need for reform in the immigration system is undeniable. But the path forward must be one based on facts, empathy, and a shared commitment to justice for all, regardless of their immigration status.

BREAKING NEWS!! just confirmed the …See more..

Trump’s Top Aides Feared He Was Shot Five Times During Butler Assassination Attempt: ‘So Much Blood’

It has been nearly a year since the chilling and jaw-dropping moment in Butler, Pennsylvania, when a would-be assassin opened fire at then-presidential candidate Donald Trump. This moment, which many feared could have been fatal, became a defining chapter in Trump’s political comeback as he overcame the terrifying assassination attempt. In an exclusive excerpt from the upcoming book 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America, obtained by The Washington Post, Trump shared his perspective on the events that followed the shooting, revealing just how close he came to death.

The book explores not just the immediate aftermath of the shooting, but the long-lasting impact it had on Trump’s image, his political fortunes, and his relationship with former critics. This assassination attempt, which took place on July 13, 2023, set the stage for a remarkable transformation in Trump’s campaign.

The Butler Assassination Attempt: A Close Call

A Bullet Fired at Trump

On that fateful day, Trump had just stepped off the stage at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, when a sniper, 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, took aim at the former president. Positioned on a rooftop about 100 yards away from the rally, Crooks fired at Trump. The shot rang out, sending immediate shockwaves through the crowd and the Secret Service. Trump was caught in the crosshairs of a life-threatening assassination attempt.

In an extraordinary display of professionalism and quick action, Secret Service agents immediately rushed Trump, tackling him to the ground and securing him away from the sniper’s line of fire. They quickly evacuated him from the venue, and the chaos that ensued was the stuff of nightmares. The attack on Trump was the last thing anyone had expected, yet it happened so suddenly and with such precision that even those closest to him feared for the worst.

The book reveals that, despite the severity of the situation, Trump was surprisingly composed. “Trump was sitting up in bed, still wearing his suit. A bandage covered his ear. There was blood everywhere,” the book recounts. The amount of blood was so severe that even his closest aides were convinced that Trump had been shot multiple times. The bleeding was intense and far beyond what anyone had anticipated, which led to serious concerns about his condition.

Trump himself later recalled the harrowing experience, commenting in an interview that the blood loss was so substantial that it almost felt like he was losing control. “It was bleeding like a b****,” Trump said, referring to the amount of blood he was losing. However, despite the traumatic events and the grave situation, Trump showed a level of resilience that was almost unexpected.

The Humor That Followed: Trump’s Resilience in the Face of Danger

One of the most striking aspects of Trump’s recovery was his ability to inject humor into the situation, even in the face of danger. Within hours of the assassination attempt, Trump began making jokes, lightening the mood in what could have been a grim and somber hospital room. His aides, who were initially shaken by the gravity of the situation, began to relax when they realized Trump was alive and in relatively good spirits.

According to the book, this was a defining moment for Trump’s resilience. “They realized he was alright because he started making jokes,” the authors write. His ability to regain his sense of humor, even in the midst of such a traumatic event, reflected his mental strength and determination to survive. This humor became a hallmark of his recovery, and his aides quickly saw that Trump’s toughness extended beyond just his physical survival—it was a mental and emotional strength that helped him recover.

Trump’s Comeback and the Transformation of His Campaign

From Candidate to Survivor

What was initially seen as a near-fatal event quickly became a cornerstone of Trump’s political comeback. In the days that followed the assassination attempt, Trump’s image shifted dramatically. He was no longer just a candidate seeking re-election; he had become a survivor of a potentially fatal attack. This brush with death, coupled with his remarkable recovery, reinvigorated his supporters and even drew praise from his former critics. The assassination attempt added a new dimension to Trump’s public persona. He was no longer just another political figure—he had become a symbol of survival, resilience, and perseverance.

Trump himself reflected on the close proximity of the shot during an interview. “130 yards is like sinking a one-foot putt,” he said, referring to the sniper’s distance. “It’s considered really close,” he continued, emphasizing just how close he came to death. The fact that he was able to survive such a close-range attack only added to the narrative of his political comeback, making him a more formidable figure in the eyes of both supporters and detractors.

The Impact on His 2024 Campaign

In the wake of the shooting, Trump’s campaign took on a new tone. The narrative was no longer solely about policy or rhetoric—it was about survival. His strength in the face of adversity became a major talking point. His supporters rallied behind him, viewing him as a figure who had not only withstood a deadly attack but had emerged even stronger for it. The symbolism of his survival resonated deeply with his base, who saw it as evidence of his resilience and determination.

Additionally, Trump’s recovery process and his response to the assassination attempt marked a turning point in the 2024 election race. His campaign, which had initially been struggling to gain momentum, saw a surge in support as people rallied around his story of survival. The moment of his near-death experience became a powerful symbol, solidifying his place in the race and giving him a renewed sense of political legitimacy.

Unexpected Support from Former Critics

What was even more surprising, however, was the shift in attitude from some of Trump’s most vocal critics. Figures like Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, and Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, had long been antagonistic toward Trump. However, after witnessing his survival of the assassination attempt, both men publicly reassessed their views of the former president.

Bezos, in particular, was quoted as saying that Trump’s instincts showed who he was as a person. “Bezos said Trump’s instincts showed who he was, and he wanted them to have a friendship,” the book reveals. For many observers, this marked a dramatic shift in the political landscape. Some of Trump’s fiercest critics were now reaching out, acknowledging his strength and resilience.

Zuckerberg, too, was impressed by Trump’s ability to recover from such a traumatic event. Describing the moment when Trump pumped his fist in the air after the shooting, Zuckerberg remarked that it was “one of the most badass things” he’d ever seen. This unexpected support from two of Silicon Valley’s most influential figures illustrated just how transformative the assassination attempt had been for Trump’s public image.

The Aftermath: A Call with Joe Biden

A Brief but Civil Exchange

After the assassination attempt, even President Joe Biden, Trump’s political rival, reached out to offer his support. Despite their tense exchange during the debates just weeks earlier, Biden initiated a brief phone call with Trump to check on his well-being. The call, though awkward and brief, was a rare moment of civility between the two political adversaries.

“The exchange was awkward after their tense debate just two weeks earlier,” the book recounts. “The call was brief. But Trump described it as ‘very nice, actually.’” This moment of political reconciliation was symbolic of the larger political landscape in which both men were operating. The shooting had forced them to momentarily put aside their differences and engage in a civil exchange, if only for a short while.

Reuniting with Family: Melania Trump’s Support

Trump’s wife, Melania Trump, was waiting for him at their Bedminster, New Jersey estate when he was discharged from the hospital. The reunion between the two after the harrowing incident was deeply emotional, with Melania offering her support and comfort. In a moment of vulnerability, Trump leaned on his family, and his wife’s presence provided him with much-needed emotional strength.

Melania’s support was pivotal in Trump’s recovery, both physically and emotionally. Their bond, which had often been scrutinized by the public, became a symbol of the strength of their family. For Trump, the shooting incident served not only as a test of his own resilience but also a reminder of the importance of family and love in times of crisis.

Conclusion: A Turning Point in Trump’s Political Journey

The assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, was a pivotal moment in Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign. What started as a near-fatal event became the cornerstone of his comeback narrative. Trump’s ability to survive the attack, coupled with his resilience and ability to recover quickly, changed the trajectory of his political career.

In the weeks and months that followed, Trump’s image transformed from a controversial candidate to a political survivor. His story of overcoming the assassination attempt became a powerful symbol of strength and resilience that resonated deeply with both his supporters and even some of his critics. The shooting incident not only solidified his place in the 2024 race but also redefined his public image in ways that few could have predicted.

This moment in Trump’s political journey underscores the unpredictability of American politics and the lengths to which candidates must go to win the hearts and minds of the electorate. Whether Trump ultimately retakes the White House in 2024 or not, the Butler assassination attempt will remain a defining chapter in his remarkable political saga.